In a dramatic turn of events, the impeachment case against Vice President Sara Duterte teeters on the edge, with legal experts warning that the ticking clock may deliver the final blow before the Senate can even begin its trial. As the days count down to June 30, 2025, the fate of this high-stakes political battle hangs in the balance, not because of political maneuvering, but because of an unyielding deadline.
Election lawyer Romulo Macalintal has declared the case “dead” if hearings commence on June 2, 2025, as planned. “The present Senate no longer has time — its term ends by June 30,” Macalintal stated in a recent interview. This stark assessment comes as the Senate prepares to convene as an impeachment court on June 3, 2025, just weeks before the end of its term.
The impeachment complaint, filed on February 5, 2025, accuses Duterte of misusing confidential funds and issuing threats against President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., First Lady Liza Araneta Marcos, and House Speaker Ferdinand Martin Romualdez. With 215 lawmakers endorsing the complaint, it easily surpassed the required one-third of the House needed to proceed, as noted in Al Jazeera. However, a procedural snag occurred when Congress adjourned on the same day, preventing the articles from being forwarded to the Senate, thus stalling the process for months.
Senate President Francis Escudero has invited the House prosecution panel to present the articles on June 2, 2025, with the Senate set to convene as an impeachment court the following day, according to Reuters. Despite this, Macalintal points out that Rule 44 of the Senate dictates that all pending matters and proceedings die with the adjournment or termination of Congress, as supported by a Supreme Court ruling. This means that any attempt by the incoming Senate to revive the case would be treated as a new filing, which is prohibited by the Constitution’s rule against filing more than one impeachment case against the same official within a one-year period, as outlined in Article XI, Section 3.
“If there’s a new impeachment case, it would fall under what’s called the prohibition in our Constitution — you cannot have two impeachment cases within one year,” Macalintal explained. This constitutional barrier effectively blocks any renewed attempt to impeach Duterte in the near future.
Escudero himself has previously described the June timeline as “practically unworkable,” a sentiment that Macalintal’s legal analysis now firmly supports. The Office of the Vice President has acknowledged receipt of the Senate’s letter regarding the June 2 proceedings, as reported by The Manila Times, but has remained silent on its defense strategy. Sources close to Duterte suggest that her camp is relying on constitutional defenses rather than political alliances to thwart the trial.
The political landscape adds another layer of complexity. Duterte, the daughter of former President Rodrigo Duterte, has faced deteriorating relations with Marcos’s allies, particularly House Speaker Martin Romualdez, as noted in Wikipedia. Her impeachment, approved by 240 lawmakers according to Rappler, marks her as the first vice president in Philippine history to face such a trial. Yet, the tight timeline and legal constraints may render this historic moment a procedural dead end.
As the days count down to June 30, 2025, the fate of the impeachment case hangs in the balance. With the Senate’s term ending and constitutional rules in play, it seems likely that time, not political maneuvering, may be the biggest obstacle for those seeking to remove Vice President Sara Duterte from office.
Key Details of the Impeachment Case
Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
Filing Date | February 5, 2025 |
Allegations | Misuse of confidential funds, threats against Marcos, Araneta, Romualdez |
House Support | 215–240 lawmakers (exceeding one-third requirement) |
Senate Trial Start | June 2, 2025 (Senate convenes as impeachment court on June 3) |
Senate Term End | June 30, 2025 |
Legal Barrier | Senate Rule 44: Pending matters die at Congress’s end |
Constitutional Limit | No impeachment proceedings against the same official within one year |
Political and Legal Context
The impeachment case stems from a fractured political alliance between Duterte and President Marcos, who ran together in 2022 under the UniTeam banner. Duterte’s resignation from Lakas–CMD in May 2023 and her strained ties with Marcos’s allies have fueled the push for her removal, as detailed in Wikipedia. The charges, including budget anomalies and alleged assassination plots, have sparked debate, with Duterte’s brother calling it “political persecution” (CNN).
Duterte has also challenged the impeachment before the Supreme Court, arguing that the articles are “defective” and violate the one-year bar rule, as reported by Reuters. The Court has yet to rule, adding uncertainty to the process.
Potential Outcomes
The tight timeline poses a significant challenge. If the Senate cannot complete the trial by June 30, 2025, the case will likely lapse. The incoming 20th Congress, starting in July 2025, would need to file a new complaint, but the constitutional one-year bar would prevent this until February 2026. This delay could protect Duterte, who is seen as a strong contender for the 2028 presidential election, according to Reuters.
Moreover, the composition of the new Senate, shaped by the May 2025 elections, could influence the trial’s outcome. A GMA News report suggests that at least seven senators may vote to acquit Duterte, needing only nine votes for acquittal in the 24-seat chamber.
Why This Matters
This impeachment case is more than a legal battle; it’s a test of the Philippines’ political and constitutional framework. It underscores the tension between accountability and procedural limits, with implications for public trust and Duterte’s political future. As the clock ticks, the nation watches to see if time will outrun justice.
Reshuff PH
Latest News In The Philippines brought to you by Reshuff PH
